Enter product name
No products to compare

HTC One E9+ vs Cubot Magic

Compare Phones: HTC One E9+ vs Cubot Magic


  Summary

6.85

For:

      Better camera (897 points vs 286 points)

      Better battery (281 points vs 185 points)

      Better performance (551 points vs 259 points)

      Better connectivity (727 points vs 165 points)

      Better display (914 points vs 106 points)

      Better design (625 points vs 186 points)

Against:

      Higher price (189.99 USD vs 68.89 USD)

  Camera

8.97

For:

      Better aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2.4)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (20.2 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)

  Battery

2.81

For:

      Better battery capacity (2800mAh vs 2600mAh)

  Performance

5.51

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)

      More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)

  Connectivity

7.27

  Display

9.14

For:

      Bigger display (5.5 inch vs 5 inch)

      Higher pixel density (534 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)

  Design

6.25

For:

      Bigger display area (69.88 percents vs 67.16 percents)

  Summary

1.38

For:

      Lower price (68.89 USD vs 189.99 USD)

Against:

      Worse camera (286 points vs 897 points)

      Worse battery (185 points vs 281 points)

      Worse performance (259 points vs 551 points)

      Worse connectivity (165 points vs 727 points)

      Worse display (106 points vs 914 points)

      Worse design (186 points vs 625 points)

  Camera

2.86

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/2.2)

      Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.2 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

  Battery

1.85

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (2600mAh vs 2800mAh)

  Performance

2.59

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)

      Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

  Connectivity

1.65

  Display

1.06

Against:

      Smaller display (5 inch vs 5.5 inch)

      Lower pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 534 pixels per inch)

  Design

1.86

Against:

      Smaller display area (67.16 percents vs 69.88 percents)

Alternatives

6.67
UMIDIGI A3 Pro
6.51
5.52
3.92
8.72
4.1
6.53
6.78
5.29
UMIDIGI A3 Pro Global Band 5.7
75$
6.15
Doogee BL5500 Lite
7.19
9.37
2.87
5.81
5.02
4.18
6.78
3.73
DOOGEE BL5500 Lite U-Notch Smartphone 6.19 inch MT
73$
5.91
UMIDIGI A3
6.51
5.52
3.19
8.72
3.35
5.48
6.78
5.29
UMIDIGI A3 Global Band 5.5
65$

Subscribe to our news

To subscribe to our email news, simply send us your email address using the form below. You will receive emails from the China Prices alerting you to latest gadget releases.