UMIDIGI Z2 Pro vs nubia Z11
Compare Phones: UMIDIGI Z2 Pro vs nubia Z11
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (961 points vs 858 points)
Better battery (710 points vs 396 points)
Better performance (949 points vs 720 points)
Better connectivity (979 points vs 860 points)
Better display (831 points vs 659 points)
Better design (952 points vs 775 points)
Against:
Higher price (233 USD vs 187.98 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3550mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 624 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2150 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.2 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.14 percents vs 76.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (187.98 USD vs 233 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (858 points vs 961 points)
Worse battery (396 points vs 710 points)
Worse performance (720 points vs 949 points)
Worse connectivity (860 points vs 979 points)
Worse display (659 points vs 831 points)
Worse design (775 points vs 952 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 3550mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2150 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (624 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.2 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.23 percents vs 85.14 percents)